Internet Governance Forum Athens, Greece Opening Ceremony 30 October 2006 Note: The following is the output of the real-time captioning taken during the The Inaugural Meeting of the IGF, in Athens on 30 October. Although it is largely accurate, in some cases it may be incomplete or inaccurate due to inaudible passages or transcription errors. It is posted as an aid to understanding the proceedings at the session, but should not be treated as an authoritative record. [ Applause ] >> Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Before we start, I would like to ask you to turn off your mobile phones. I am very glad to be able to welcome you here to the inaugural meeting for the Internet Governance Forum, which starts today, and will go on until Thursday in Athens. I will now give the floor to the Greek minister for transport, Mr. Liapis, who will be presiding this section. [ Applause ] >>MINISTER MICHALIS LIAPIS: Prime minister, representatives of the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Secretary-General of the international telecommunications union, ministers, commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, it's with a feeling of great honor and allow me to say also personal satisfaction for me here in my own country today to preside the first global assembly on Internet governance Internet governance. I would like to welcome all of you representatives of governance and international government organizations and representatives of the private sector and of civil society. When in Tunis we expressed our wish to host the inaugural meeting of this new forum, we did so in full awareness of the huge scope and the importance of what we were about to do. It was a challenge, a challenge which we embraced. We embraced it because we believed in the vision of a global society where the Internet would build bridges between countries, cultures, people, and would contribute to peace and the advance of humanity. So we are particularly pleased that Greece, the cradle of democracy, is hosting the first meeting on Internet governance, which is far and away the most democratic means of communication in the modern world. This is -- this forum is following a multistakeholder, open process, a NASCENT process which should not be inspired by dogmas and stereotypes. On the contrary, we believe that it has to be seen as a platform, a platform to promote all forms of innovatory ideas and free-thinking. It's, therefore, a unique opportunity to have a creative dialogue which will give rise to policy, a dialogue which will state before the whole world that the IGF is worthy of its founding vision. Major developments have taken place since the adoption of the Tunis agenda on the information society. That was about one year ago. The main, major development here was the recent approval of the United States government, its approval to grant further autonomy to ICANN, thus taking a step towards full independence in terms of Internet governance for forthcoming years. Ladies and gentlemen, the Internet is the start of a vast overhaul, a reshaping of our society, which it will take several decades to complete. It is going to be the most important tool in intellectual development. It will affect all of us, all of us in the way in which we run our businesses, right through to the way in which we live our daily lives. The drop in the cost of Internet access will follow on from global diffusion of I.T. and also diffusion of knowledge in the future as well that of wisdom. Those people who are not familiar with using the Internet will be left on the sidelines of society, like someone who has grown up in the jungle and then tries to adapt to life in the town. Thus, the IGF must be a forum in which we can shape our common global vision for the development and growth of the Internet. But we also have to shape principles, rules, and democratic processes which will provide an orderly outcome to -- an orderly form to its outcome. To facilitate access to knowledge, to provide citizens with the necessary skills in order to have freedom of expression and also free movement of ideas. It is our standing aim to bring about ongoing economic development and social progress for our people. This can be achieved by establishing a correct legal, political, and regulatory framework which will guarantee the respect of the Internet's founding principles. What we need to do, in particular, is to constantly strive to develop action to protect children against exploitation, protect their rights in their links with the Internet in order to empower also young people as basic players in forming a participatory civil society. But we also have to extend opportunities to involve them in electronic-style processes. I would like to stress that Greece has taken off, it's taken off on a new line of development with a series of reforms in all fields. We are systematically tapping and making the most of the advantages offered by our country, and we are creating an attractive investment climate, providing new opportunities for business initiatives on a vast scale. We are stressing here energy, tourism, the banking sector, trade, transport, shipping, and, of course, communications. In this new economic environment, the Internet technology, digital cohesion provide the basis, but at the same time, the driving force. We are investing in training and I.T. We have put in huge efforts to extend Internet use by our assistance. At this very moment, we are developing programs and actions to extend broadband use, both in our infrastructures and within our services. We've taken specific measures to facilitate the access of young people to the Internet, students, in particular. And we are committed to these efforts. We will continue them. Our efforts are starting to bear fruits. We have now achieved one of the highest growth rates for broadband connections throughout the whole world, putting into practice our political commitment to build a citizen-focused information society with no social exclusion and oriented towards development. It's also important that we should apply technology cautiously. We have always to have at the forefront of our minds the human factor. We shouldn't allow a rupture in normal communication between human beings. We shouldn't allow the Internet to lead to their physical isolation. And that's why governments have to play a leading role in developing a long-term strategy with productive investment to ensure that education, the development of research and technology, are at the forefront, that we can strike a balance between the various different groups, and that we can boost competitive prospects so that we can ensure the security of the infrastructure and the Internet. The remit from Tunis was that the IGF should contribute to achieving the vision of an anthropocentric, participatory society, focused on growth and development. Thus, the theme before us here in Athens stresses this idea of development and growth aiming to bridge the digital divide, taking into account the different levels and also looking for ways to ensure that everyone can reap the benefits provided by ICT. Thus, this forum can become a meeting point, a meeting point at which we can kick off the process for converting this digital divide into a Digital opportunity. Ladies and gentlemen, organizing this forum is a complex, demanding job. Our cooperation with the special advisor of the U.N. Secretary-General on Internet governance, Mr. Desai, was really outstanding. I would like to thank all of you, and the U.N. staff, for having supported this meeting. I would also like to thank the ITU, in particular, the Secretary-General of that body, Mr. Utsumi, who has given us this unique opportunity to communicate our message to a wide audience of both state and non-state players. I would also like to extend my very warmest thanks to the member countries of the regional groups based in Geneva, who were very present in the preparatory work and really helped us to prepare for this meeting in Athens. The presence here and also the large number of submissions from representatives of the private sector and civil society, including also the academic and technical communities, were not only welcomed, but also highly encouraging. And your impressive participation here today instills us with confidence and optimism as to the outcome of this meeting. Finally, I would like to take this opportunity to welcome you all once again, and wish all the best to this forum over the forthcoming four days. This is a forum which I am confident will show how we can move towards success in future meetings of the IGF, which, as you will all be aware, will be meeting in Brazil, India, and Egypt in 2007, 2008, and 2009 respectively. Thank you very much, indeed. [ Applause ] I would now like to ask the Greek prime minister, Mr. Konstantinos Karamanlis, to declare open the first Internet Governance Forum. You have the floor, prime minister. [ Applause ] >>PRIME MINISTER MR. K. KARAMANLIS: Mr. Secretary-General, Mr. Secretary-General of the ITU, ministers, commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, it is with great pleasure that I open today the first meeting of the Internet Governance Forum, thus implementing one of the main decisions of the Tunis World Summit on the Information Society. Today, we inaugurate a process in order to meet one of the main challenges of our time, the future form of the Internet and its capacity to provide increasing opportunities for an inclusive, global community, with no exclusions, opportunities which were unimaginable a few years ago. Greece, being the host country of the inaugural meeting of this novel and unique process, is well aware, fully aware of its importance and its comprehensive nature. This forum, through a multistakeholder approach, unites under the same goal and vision governments, intergovernmental organizations, the private sector, and, of course, civil society. In this way, it institutionalizes a successful practice already established during the preparatory process. Taking into consideration our shared interest in the ongoing robustness and dynamism of the Internet, this forum should be considered as an opportunity for a multistakeholder policy dialogue. Its conclusions should ideally help identify and build consensus. They should also inspire us with a shared vision and a common understanding of the way forward. The IGF provides an open and transparent platform for establishing dialogue among all stakeholders. It can facilitate the exchange of ideas and examples of best practices concerning Internet governance. Through increased interaction among stakeholders, the free flow of ideas may lead to an independent and reflective treatment of the more important issues. At the same time, the diversity of participants, combined with the openness of this forum, offer an opportunity for the serious engagement of all stakeholders. We all acknowledge that Internet, which is a central element of the infrastructure of the information society, has evolved, from a research and academic facility, it has become a global means of communication available to everyone. Nowadays, ICT makes possible for a vastly large population to join in, to share, and expand the base of human knowledge. It contributes to the further growth in every aspect of human endeavor, especially in education, health, and science. The adoption of ICT by enterprises plays a fundamental role in growth, while well-implemented investments in ICT lead to an increased -- to increased trade opportunities and more and better employment. Ladies and gentlemen, openness, simplicity, freedom in accessing and receiving information, along with its distributed nature, are among the main principles the Internet's success has been based on. These principles have enabled the Internet to grow rapidly and to adapt to new demands and opportunities. The Internet governance body should encompass these principles in order to respond appropriately to the rapidly changing operational environment of the Internet. Given its global role today, the Internet must continue to provide the means of supporting open, accessible, and free exchange of information, ideas, and opinions around the world. We must commit ourselves to stability, security, and effective governance of the Internet as a global facility, and this calls for the participation of all stakeholders, from both the developed and developing countries, within, of course, their respective roles and responsibilities. After all, the Internet governance includes more than Internet naming and addressing. It includes significant public policy issues, the management of critical Internet resources, security, safety, as well as other social and economic issues. The approach we follow should be inclusive and responsive to challenges and should continue to promote an enabling environment for innovations, competition, and investments. To ensure the operational character of the Internet as a global network, the Internet governance model should not only build on existing structures, but also on cutting-edge innovations. It should capitalize on well-known and successful practices and frameworks, putting particular emphasis on new ideas and on the complementarities between parties involved on a democratic, transparent, and multilateral process. We need close cooperation among all the involved and interested parties, and this should include the development of globally applicable principles on public policy issues associated with the coordination and management of critical resources. Now, if I may stretch a little bit this deliberation, it is the analogy of Professor Negreponte's three interconnected circles that we should be focusing on. The interactive world, the entertainment world, and the information world are these three interconnected circles. Recognizing the existence of the digital divide and the challenges this poses for many countries, we should put special emphasis on the development, planning, and capacity-building necessary. Bridging the digital divide requires adequate and sustainable investments in communications infrastructure and services, capacity-building and technology transfer, and all this for many years to come. Advances in communications technology and high-speed data networks continuously increase the possibilities offered to developing countries and countries with transitional economies, allows them to participate in the global market. Everyone should have equal opportunities to acquire the necessary skills and knowledge in order to comprehend and participate actively in and benefit fully from the Internet and the economy of knowledge. Within this line of thinking, I would like to urge our societies to produce and distribute even more $100 laptop-like projects. Mr. Secretary-General, ladies and gentlemen, I would say that our future appears to be deeply intertwined with the Internet. The Internet will be there, with all its advantages and shortcomings. The scope and the policy of this meeting is to ensure that the Internet will be an effective tool to promote knowledge, to promote peace, security and stability. The Internet can and should enhance democracy, social cohesion, good governance, and the rule of law, both at the national and the international level. It is our challenging task to ensure that it will respond to the particular needs of those widely described as the digitally homeless. Our attention should turn eventually to the more vulnerable groups of society, and this includes migrants, refugees, the unemployed, underprivileged people, the young, senior citizens, and persons with special needs. In this first IGF meeting, we expect to set the scene and establish a solid and comprehensive framework and network and focus on issues such as affordability and availability of the Internet; interconnection costs and security; management of critical resources and technology transfer; multilingualism and local development of software; capacity-building and participation of multistakeholders from developing countries. In this context of letting the Internet evolve based on its positive attributes of being open, transparent, and nonfragmented, the IGF aims at addressing ways to promote the free flow of information which should allow the ability and include the ability to communicate across linguistic boundaries and ensure the respect of freedom of expression. It is a fact that the Internet has become a strategically vital part of the communications infrastructure of most countries. Consequently, it directly affects the economic and social development of these countries. It is, therefore, imperative to consider the Internet governance -- to consider Internet governance as an issue of critical importance and high priority. The IGF aspires to be the framework where we start the process for the development and realization of a common vision regarding the evolution of the Internet and the information society. This common challenge is of paramount importance for today's world, and most importantly for future generations. The IGF, structuring the issues around the democratizing effect of the Internet can introduce a meaningful dialogue on how to promote worldwide free flow of information. I would have thought that before we move to Internet democracy, it would be rather reasonable to firstly enhance democracy in the Internet itself. I am sure that the participants will benefit from the networking offered here in Athens, and they will acquire new knowledge of best practices and form new knowledge hubs. I hope that they will achieve a very good idea of what new, pressing issues are. And I think that they should embrace rather than avoid the unfinished issues of the world summit in Tunis and proceed in a critical assessment of international institutions involved in ICT governance. The implementation of the World Summit on the Information Society in Tunis will be among the main elements for judging the future successes of the IGF, along with establishing an institutional identity and also structuring the forum and building trust among all stakeholders. We are proud that this first and important effort to govern the Internet and render it more accessibility is taking place here in Greece. It is, indeed, an effort to the benefit of all mankind. Ladies and gentlemen, I wish you every success with the work lying ahead during the next four days. Thank you. [ Applause ] >> Thank you very much, indeed. That was very interesting to hear your interesting opinions there. And also thank you for your best wishes for the success of our forum. I would now like to ask the special advisor to the U.N. Secretary-General, Mr. Desai, to take the floor. [ Applause ] >>MR. NITIN DESAI: Honorable prime minister, Mr. Liapis, the chairman of the IGF, honorable ministers, commissioner, distinguished representatives of the business and civil society sector, ladies and gentlemen, may I begin first with a -- on behalf of the U.N. Secretary-General and the advisory group which I chair, of thanking the prime minister, the minister, and the government and the people of Greece for hosting this first meeting of the Internet Governance Forum. Mr. Liapis spoke about the cooperation with the U.N. Cooperation with a two-way affair, and I really would like to say that we truly appreciate the generosity and flexibility which Mr. Liapis and his staff have shown in allowing us to organize this forum. It's truly appropriate that we should be meeting here in Athens, a city associated with the very idea of open democracy, particularly in this hosting of the first open house for the citizens of the global Internet for this forum, which brings together stakeholders who often meet separately, but seldom together, a forum which, hopefully, will be as innovative as the Internet, and be a harbinger of a new type of multilateralism which brings together multiple stakeholders around a purpose, a forum which I hope will be as much about listening as it will be about talking. So Prime Minister, the secretary-general of the United Nations would really have loved to be present at this meeting. He has taken a strong interest in this area. But as you would appreciate, with the general assembly in session and a new secretary-general about to take over, he has certain preoccupations. But he has asked me to convey a message to this gathering. And now I will read the message of the U.N. secretary-general to the Internet Governance Forum. It gives me pleasure to send my greetings to this inaugural meeting of the Internet Governance Forum, generously hosted by the government and people of Greece. The forum is an important new vehicle for multistakeholder policy dialogue. It sustains the momentum generated by the two-phase World Summit on the Information Society. And it represents further progress in our efforts to extend the benefits of information and communication technology to all the world's people. Indeed, I am very encouraged that during the preparatory process, all stakeholders acknowledge that the Internet can play a powerful role in helping developing countries to advance their economic and social well-being, and agreed on the developmental dimension as an overarching priority of the forum. Today, the forum enters uncharted waters. Its mandate, decided upon at the highest political level, calls on it to serve not as a convenor of governments but of all stakeholders. The forum will thus have to develop procedures and practices for cultivating meaningful cooperation among these disparate partners. While this will be a challenge, the Internet lends itself particularly well to this search for new forms of global collaboration. With more than one billion users worldwide and still growing dramatically, the Internet has outgrown its origins as a network run by and for computer specialists. Indeed, it has become too important, for almost every country's economy and administration, for governments not to take an interest. The challenge, therefore, is to bring two cultures together: The non-governmental Internet community, with its tradition of informal, bottom-up decision-making, and the more formal, structured world of governments and intergovernmental organizations. The Internet Governance Forum is well placed to contribute to that effort by fostering dialogue, and by giving voice to a wide range of views, including developing-country individuals and institutions involved in Internet Governance. Its emphasis will be on voluntary cooperation, not legal compulsion. And while the forum is not designed to take decisions, it can identify issues that need to be tackled through formal intergovernmental processes. I hope this inaugural meeting will launch a process of mutual learning, generate knew ideas, and perhaps even see the emergence of some new partnerships. Please accept my best wishes for a successful gathering. This ends the message of the U.N. secretary-general. Thank you. [ Applause ] >>MINISTER MICHALIS LIAPIS: Thank you very much, indeed, Mr. Desai for those particularly warm words about my country, and also the very interesting views expressed as well as the message from the secretary-general of the United Nations. I would like to break for a couple of minutes so that Mr. Desai himself can accompany the Prime Minister out, and then we will come back after these two minutes to continue with the further presentations. Thank you. (gavel). >>MINISTER MICHALIS LIAPIS: Please take a seat because we will now continue as I promised you. It was a very short break, just two minutes. And I would now like to give the floor to the next speaker, who is the secretary-general of the international telecommunication union, Mr. Utsumi. Mr. Utsumi, you have the floor [ Applause ] >>SECRETARY-GENERAL UTSUMI: Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, good morning. It is my pleasure to give some opening remarks at the inaugural meeting of the Internet Governance Forum. What better place to talk of advancing good governance of the Internet than here in Greece, the birthplace of democracy. Ever since -- Ever since then, Greece has played a very important role in advancing our core values of dialogue, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. Greece is also the birthplace of Socrates, a Greek philosopher who is now widely credited as having been the wisest man in all of Greece. He was born in Athens, where he spent most of his time in enthusiastic pursuit of wisdom. Socrates had many devoted followers such as Plato, whose subsequent teachings are seen as a great contribution to modern-day thinking. But Socrates also had many angry detractors. Due to his then controversial challenges to conventional wisdom and popular beliefs, opinions about him were widely polarized, drawing both very high praise and very severe criticism. Sometimes it is dangerous to be ahead of your times. Socrates fell into grave disrepute with the public powers at that time, and he was arrested and accused of various crimes. He was sentenced to die by drinking poison, or else to leave the country as an exile. He felt no fear of death, and at the age of 70, he drank hemlock and died. I have had the privilege of serving as secretary-general of the international telecommunication union since 1998. Over our 141 years of history, the ITU has often had to adapt to dramatic changes in the global communications environment, and I feel very lucky to have served during this particular period which has witnessed a dramatic growth and impact of the Internet and mobile communications. I am also proud that the ITU has been the instigator and successful organizer of the World Summit on the Information Society. I would like to, today, as usual, in the spirit of Socrates, challenge beliefs some of you have as to how the Internet should be governed. The IGF was created because there remains a continued lack of consensus on Internet Governance. Yes, there is a camp who will claim that for certain issues there is no need to further discuss because things are working quite well and there is no need to change. But there is another camp that disagrees and says that this is just an attempt to avoid debate by claiming there are no problems. To me, it is obvious that if these issues were really settled, then there would be no reason to create an IGF. You would not be here, and there would be nothing to discuss. Let us not claim falsely that we know there are no problems. Let us welcome open debate in the great spirit Athenian democracy. The underlying theme of this first IGF meeting is supposed to be a focus on development. However, I do not share the perspective of those who argue that Internet Governance is just a developing-country problem. I disagree, because the basis of this perspective is that with just more capacity building, then developing countries will come around to a certain enlightened point of view. We have heard this often, and it borders on arrogance. Many of the critics of the current system of Internet Governance are not from developing countries, and they are extremely well-informed. Many of them are tired of hearing "you just don't understand." Many do fully understand, particularly after WSIS. Many also understand that no matter what technical experts argue is the best system, or no matter what self-serving justifications are made that this is the only possible way to do things, there are no such systems or technologies that can eternally claim they are best. And many know, no matter what is discussed or decided here, in the end it will be the global marketplace that will define a final outcome. What are the elements of this marketplace? Of course, there are issues common to all markets. Does it match what users want? What is the price, availability, and convenience? Does it meet local priorities and needs? Then there is the issue that relates in particular to the Internet: The ability to rapidly innovate at the edge of the network. And it is here, most of all, that I see the current centralized system as weak. What is needed is more diversity and a recognition of the principle of user's true needs. In order to respond to the need of the users, what is lacking is a viewpoint that matters should be handled at a level that is closer to the user and that any central role should have only a subsidiary function, performing only those tasks which cannot be handled more effectively at a more immediate or local level. Whenever there are discussions of governance, it is natural that there are discussions on the role of governments. Replicating a debate that took place in the 1920s with radio, there has been much debate on the role of government in the Internet. It is interesting that this debate has shifted significantly in the last few years. In the 1990s, a common question of many of you present here was, "Should the Internet be regulated?" Now, only ten years later, to have even asked such a question seems remarkably naive, particularly when we see the extent of Internet-related legislation enacted daily around the world. The reason for this is that the Internet has now become a central part of everyday life and cannot be treated differently from the rest of society and the economy. This means, for better or for worse, that the Internet will, in due course, not be governed or regulated in a way that is fundamentally different from the way that other things are governed. And this is why the future of Internet Governance is inevitably local rather than global. It is because the best approach is different for each society and economy. During your discussions, I hope that you keep an open mind. There are rarely absolute truths in human endeavors. Today's common sense may become tomorrow's heresy. And as demonstrated by Socrates, history has also demonstrated that today's heretical views may be tomorrow's widely accepted wisdom. So ladies and gentlemen, may I wish you the best of luck in your discussions. I thank you very much. [ Applause ] >>MINISTER MICHALIS LIAPIS: Thank you very much, indeed, Mr. Utsumi, or the views which you have expressed on behalf of the international telecommunications union. I would also like to thank him for the role his union has played in assisting us so much. And I am amazed at his in-depth knowledge about Socrates. And also the fact that he was able to link an ancient philosopher with modern technology. So thank you very much, indeed, Mr. Utsumi. I would now like to invite the Egyptian minister of communications and ICT, Mr. Kamel, to take the floor. [ Applause ] >>MINISTER TAREK KAMEL: Mr. Yoshio Utsumi, Secretary-General of the ITU, Mr. Michalis Liapis, Minister of Transport and Communications in Greece, Mr. Nitin Desai, Special Advisor to the United Nations Secretary-General for Internet Governance, Madame Viviane Reding, Commissioner for Information Society and Media at the European Commission, and colleagues, Mr. Vint Cerf, a real godfather of the Internet pioneering community, Mr. Guy Sebban, ICC, Mrs. Natasha Primo, Mr. Bob Kahn, honorable audience, ladies and gentlemen. It gives me great pleasure and honor to be with you today addressing your distinguished gathering at this remarkable event, marking the beginning of a new process for Internet Governance dialogue. The first Internet Governance Forum. First, I would like, on behalf of the Egyptian government, to extend special thanks to the government of Greece headed by His Excellency Mr. Konstantinos Karamanlis, Prime Minister of Greece, for hosting this important event and to all the parties that have contributed to its successful organization, especially the IGF Advisory Group, its chairman Mr. Nitin Desai, and its Secretariat headed by our friend, Mr. Markus Kummer. Allow me to seize the chance to express our sincere appreciation for the tremendous efforts of Mr. Kofi Annan, the U.N. Secretary-General, who spared no efforts to support the process of Internet Governance since the first phase of the WSIS led by the ITU in Geneva and until the convening of the IGF here in Athens. Let me also extend our warm congratulations to Mr. Ban Ki-Moon wishing him the best in his sacred mission to build bridges and close divides. Here we convene at the first IGF meeting after a long process that involved sincere efforts of all stakeholders from both developing and developed countries. Today, the global Internet community is clearly reassured that this newly born forum comes to respond to and materialize the need for a stronger international dialogue and participation and more collaborative cooperation on Internet Governance. Ladies and gentlemen, the indisputable imprint of the Internet on our lives should always remind us of the long journey that the early Internet community has passed through to reach this point. It is with no doubt that this Internet has developed to what it is today in a bottom-up approach, where its evolution is historically attributed to technical and research pioneers such as Mr. Vint Cerf and Mr. Bob Kahn. I have personally witnessed and benefited as a professional among many others from a strong collaboration among the professional community and the industry as well as the support of organizations such as ISOC, which successfully promoted the Internet and helped it to spread freely worldwide in a way that has really materializing the concept of Internet for all. Despite its young age, the Internet has turned into a robust mechanism transforming all walks of our lives: The way we learn, work, communicate and do business. Its impact is not confined upon individuals only but it is extended to be a key factor in the world economy as well. Internet is, all the more, presenting itself as a prerequisite for the global Information Society, to an extent that it has become one of the main pillars of the socioeconomic development at large. With this increasing reliance on the Internet as a revolutionary resource for growth and development of humanity, it became more and more necessity to ensure the stability, sustainability, and security of this global medium through more international cooperation and coordination. This has led to the emergence of the Internet Governance theme strongly on the international arena and within the global Internet public policy dialogue. Internet Governance has been an ever broadening subject with the intertwined technical and policy dimensions where it is hard to draw the line. It also implies broader and diversified issues, such as Spam, Internet exchange point, international interconnection costs and multilingualism, as well as security frauds, data protection, consumer protection and privacy to name only a few. It is therefore essential for the Internet to be an area of cooperation, inclusion, innovation and integration. It is our mission to make maximum use of the IGF to fulfill this concept and gain from all opportunities for the benefit of the global Internet community, while allowing the Internet, as promoted by the industry to grow its growth -- to continue its growth as a central element of the global Information Society infrastructure. Ladies and gentlemen, although the Internet is developing and spreading in an unforeseen pace, yet its uptake in developing societies is still relatively slow and lagging behind, and is thus contributing to a widening ICT gap and increasing Digital Divide. Let us not forget, ladies and gentlemen, that access is only available to one billion users out of the global world population exceeding six billion. Most developing nations still face the same set of barriers that limit Internet access and penetration in the countries and negatively affect the development of their economies. Those barriers, usually include issues such as high costs of bandwidth, scarcity of local content, and availability of suitable infrastructure, in addition of lack of human resource development and professional training programs. Other barriers to Internet penetration which are not confined to developing society, but also extend to some developed areas, include the absence of a truly diverse and inclusive multilingual Internet, capable of addressing all user needs irrespective of their language or cultural identity. The language barrier comes as a major hindrance that faces national governments in their endeavors to increase Internet uptake and promote online services. It is therefore fair to say that increasing Internet outreach and promoting national e-services and e-Government initiatives can only be accomplished if people across the world are enabled to access and use the Internet by overcoming all those obstacles. It is imperative for the international community to realize that unless all those problems are tackled and solved through cooperation among all actors, this powerful instrument will not be able to flourish and expand as desired. With all this in mind, the IGF advisory group, in which Egypt is gladly represented, has attempted to comprise an agenda which meets the concerns and expectations of all stakeholders. It has agreed on addressing during this first meeting, the main theme of Internet Governance for development, reflecting four broad topics, namely: Openness, security, diversity and access, with capacity building as a cross-cutting priority. Ladies and gentlemen, in Egypt, Internet development has succeeded via a strong public-private partnership and through an intense collaborative community effort that includes private sector, academia and civil society. Many challenges and obstacles are being faced along this process such as low-cost penetration, immature markets, developing infrastructure as well as awareness and funding issues. Yet our experience in Egypt is no different than those of other emerging markets which are usually confronted by similar challenges in their attempts to develop this critical and significant sector. Egypt remains firmly committed to its goal of bridging the Digital Divide to ensure that its citizens derive the maximum benefit from information and communication technology. This commitment to fostering a transition to an Information Society is made not as an end in itself but rather as a means to more -- towards more fundamental goals of the developing the Egyptian community. In a deregulated environment, the ICT sector in Egypt was one of the first sectors to demonstrate a series of successful partnerships between the government, the private sector and the civil society through a number of innovative initiatives falling within its general e-readiness plan and aiming at providing all citizens with easy affordable access to the units afforded by new technologies. Ladies and gentlemen, last month Egypt has hosted the African preparatory meeting for the IGF in cooperation with the economic commission for Africa. The meeting has emphasized the fact that Internet communities of the developing world, more than others, need to multiply their efforts and actively participate to the Internet Governance process in order to increase their stake and overcome the existing divide. This can only be achieved if cooperation and participation among all actors is ensured, especially when empowered by the support of the international community through the right human resource development programs. The process of the African regional Internet registry, AfriNIC, is a great example that illustrates the power of multistakeholder cooperation in Internet Governance issues, especially for developing regions and emerging markets. Egypt has been actively involved in this process of AfriNIC establishment and is proud to be hosting its mirror site for technical operation, while the main site is in South Africa and the headquarter in Mauritius and the human resource development programs running in {}. A truly cooperative model. AfriNIC is a success that couldn't have been achieved without the strong collaboration among the various stakeholders, government, private sector and civil societies of the different African countries and without the continued support of the international Internet community, especially from the regional Internet registries and from the ICANN. Today, Africa can enjoy the results of this fruitful cooperation. Building upon this collaboration, we have been also actively involved with the global community in supporting initiatives to drive the Internet towards more internationalization. Hosted at one of the private sector data centers in Egypt, we launch a regional resolution server mirroring one of the Internet root servers. We also host the ICANN regional office of the Middle East in our newly established technology park, the pyramids smart village. In this respect, I would like to recognize the effort recently exerted by ICANN and the U.S. government in taking the right steps towards an enhanced autonomy with growing international mandate for ICANN, and thus responding to the international concerns on Internet Governance that arose at the WSIS in Tunis. Ladies and gentlemen, over the past few years, the world has witnessed a paradigm shift in online services and applications. This was articulated by the convergence between fixed and mobile and the convergence between telecom and media, blurring the bound trees tween between the longstanding separated worlds, thanks to the Internet protocol that has stimulated the end-user's need for the always-on Hi high-speed access to information, anywhere, anytime. It has further created innovative business models together with new sources of revenues and has imposed new regulatory frameworks in order to ensure the stability and sustainability of such a convening world. Innovation in the Internet world has triggered convergence, not only in technology and services but also in stakeholders and their dialogues. Accordingly, new synergies and cooperation models have emerged and resulted in cross-fertilization among different actors and parties that did not communicate before. Over the coming few days, many workshops are being organized through collaboration among various stakeholders in a way that clearly illustrates those new synergies. An example in this endeavor is the workshop on multilingualism that Egypt is organizing in cooperation with the UNESCO and ICANN. I would like at this opportunity to stress on the importance of the global community should be investing more and more efforts and resources to adopt a global multilingual e-content initiative. I personally believe this should be one of our main priorities during the coming phase in our venture to build a truly diverse and inclusive Internet which can penetrate through new segments and expand to completely new horizons. We need to illustrate as a community a further success in this endeavor about e-content as we did before on the access level. Ladies and gentlemen, the Internet enjoys special characteristics which have made it unique worldwide and indispensable. While we introduce new features to the Internet and in our attempt to strengthen its outreach, it is vital to ensure that this unique character and irreplaceable structure of the Internet is preserved, maintained and built upon. Security and stability of the Internet should not be affected at any level and the integrity of one Internet for all should always be kept ahead of us. Our expectations from the IGF and for the IGF are endless. It should create a space for deepening dialogue among various stakeholders. It should lead reform built on the development of existing structure and make use of all available resources. The first IGF agenda certainly enhances aspiration of those stakeholders who are also expecting agreement on the future functioning of the forum as well as substantive priorities and roadmap. A developmental handling of the wider scope of the themes of Internet governance is really vital. Ladies and gentlemen, our deliberations today need to be inclined towards the future. How do you foresee the Internet in ten years from now? How can the Internet benefit -- How can the Internet benefit the coming generations and act as a revolutionary agent for enhancing people's quality of life, especially in least developed areas? How should our societies better utilize the Internet and rely on its innovation to further develop and prosper? Similar questions should guide our work and map for the IGF and should inspire our plans for Internet Governance during the coming phase. I am certain that this meeting will provide, throughout the coming four days, positive and constructive input from all actors on the issues under discussion. I am also confident that our deliberations and discussion will make this event a successful starting point for the IGF process. Finally, allow me to conclude by expressing my personal delight to be participating in this historic event, not only because I am confident that it will present an additional milestone in the cooperation among the global Internet community, but also because I find myself sharing this panel with Internet pioneers to whom the development and advancement of the Internet is attributed. I therefore recall the words expressed by U.N. secretary-general secretary-general during his speech at the globe forum on Internet Governance in March 2004 that, "In managing, promoting and protecting the Internet presence in our lives, we need to be no less creative than those who invented it." Finally, I wish you a fruitful and successful event and look forward to welcoming you all in Egypt for the fourth Internet Governance Forum in 2009. Thank you very much. [ Applause ] >>MINISTER MICHALIS LIAPIS: Thank you very much, Mr. Kamel, for the very interesting points you have been making. I would also like to thank you for updating us on what is going on in your country, and we recognize that Egypt has made every effort in order to overcome the Digital Divide. Now, at this point, it is an honor for us to give the floor to the E.U. commissioner for the Information Society, Mrs. Viviane Reding. Madam commissioner, you have the floor. [ Applause ] >>COMMISSIONER VIVIANE REDING: Colleague ministers, special representatives of the United Nations Secretary-General, Secretary-General of the ITU, excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, let me start by saying that I am honored to feel here the possibility to address the participants in the first meeting of the Internet Governance Forum, not least because this forum is held here in Greece at the invitation of the Greek government in this beautiful and historic city of Athens, but also because of the importance that the European Union has placed on the development of Internet. On behalf of the European Commission, let me also thank the United Nations in making the necessary preparatory arrangements to ensure that the IGF will be a success. I'm, of course, particularly glad that a city in European Union has been chosen as a place for this first meeting of the Internet Governance Forum. And it is fitting that it is here in Athens, the ancient cradle of democracy, where citizens and officials from all over the world meet in order to debate an issue of governance. And I have no doubt that this event will contribute to the democracy of the Internet and to the virtues of governments. So will dialogue, cooperation, and respect. And I therefore am a strong supporter of the Internet Governance Forum and the open, global, and multistakeholder approach it represents. Now, the IGF will be one important pillar of the new model of enhanced cooperation between all stakeholders agreed upon in Tunis last year. It does not replace negotiations between governments on the enhanced cooperation model, but it is complementary as a process. And I expect that it will generate a lot of ideas, a lot of solution, and these ideas and solutions I intend to introduce them into the talks between governments. And in this respect, I have, for instance, seen a very promising contribution on an improved model for DNS management. Ladies and gentlemen, the Internet Governance Forum is a direct result of the World Summit. And for -- this is a new step forward on an international consensus on governance issues, based, of course, on the principles of freedom, multistakeholder dialogue, accountable private sector management. And here in Athens, we are now translating one of those Tunis elements from words into action. Well, as we all know, the two main elements of Tunis were ICTs for development and Internet governance. These two elements are present in, for instance, a debate on Internet governance for development. And I very much look forward to the discussions on these key issues of openness, security, diversity, access. These issues are truly global. And the responses they call for will be of crucial importance equally for developing countries and for those which are already economically developed. Let me recall the overreaching principles that shaped the process of Tunis and which should guide us through our discussions in the next coming days. Firstly, and perhaps most importantly, the need to respect fundamental human rights and the need to protect freedom of expression. In just a few years, the Internet has turned into one of the most dynamic communication tools the world has ever seen. The flow of information that it facilitates strengthens democratic processes, stimulates economic growth, allows for cross-fertilizing exchanges of knowledge. But, but, too often, this very freedom is under attack from those that do not value freedom of expression or disregard the economic and social benefits of allowing a free flow of information within and across borders. Freedom, ladies and gentlemen, is sometimes seen as a threat to those who do not value human rights or want to impose their vision of the worlds or their religious belief. But the key element for the European Commission is, therefore, to keep the Internet as open and as censorship-free zone, where all the world's citizens can communicate freely with each other without needing to seek the permission of anyone else, not least, their governments, in line with internationally recognized fundamental rights. Secondly, we should acknowledge the benefits of Internet to development policies. Tunis has taught us a lot in this respect, because the benefits of the Internet must be shared by all world citizens, not just those in northern Europe, in northern America, and southeast Asia. In other words, the digital divide needs to be bridged. Much of this will have to do with improving access to the necessary hardware, software, connectivity in developing countries, because Internet is for all and has to be for all. And this is why the European Union, which is already the largest world donor of development aid, will continue to work on bridging this digital divide. And I believe that mobile telephony and satellite communications offer very promising solutions in that respect. Let me add a point. Bridging the digital divide is not just a matter of screens and cables to all parts of the world. Important, they are. It is equally important to recognize the extent and the value of cultural diversity within the global village created by the Internet. And that is why multilingualism is a theme that very often, and rightly so, comes up in this context. Because by its very nature, it promotes culturally and linguistically diverse content on the Internet. Take for instance the IDNs, which are sometimes wrongly seen as a technical issue. Notwithstanding the important consideration on stability that needs to be addressed, there is, above all, a legitimate political imperative for the Internet to offer different language scripts. Users would want to be able to use, for instance, China's ideograms, Arabic scripts. And there is a real danger that prolonged delay in the introduction of IDNs could lead to a fragmentation of the Internet's name space. At the same time, I believe we should also think about multilingualism in Internet governance mechanisms themselves. The Internet that we know today and that we value very much has its roots in the developed world, particularly in Europe and in United States. And English has been and will continue to be a very useful lingua franca, most of all for worldwide communities. But today the Internet has outgrown the original academic network. Today, the people's Internet moves towards Web point zero, in which every Web citizen will become a creator of Web content. And those individuals thus have an increasing interest in participating in the debate over how the Internet can and should be run, including security issues and the participation of citizens and businesses in a more efficient chain of responsibility. Ladies and gentlemen, spam is one example that affects us all. And in particular impedes success for developing countries. We have to work together to maintain and reinforce the dependability of the Internet. And that is exactly what people expect from us. That is exactly what we should discuss about. And that is exactly what we should do during these two days to come. And that is also what the Internet Governance Forum is about, bringing the civil society from across the world into the debate. So far, too often, thee debates, you agree with me, are restricted to a limited group of actions. So it is very important to open this debate. And I congratulate the organizers of today's event for providing the opportunity for participants of many countries to meet and utilize many languages. And I call on the Internet governance bodies around the world to follow this good example of the IGF and to consider how they can also bring more people from different linguistic groups into the debate. Ladies and gentlemen, ministers, to conclude, I would like to wish all the participants a very big success. May the democratic heritage of Athens inspire us, guide our debates, even if they are controversial. Because the future of the Internet will very much depend on such an open dialogue and on the willingness of all interested parties, whether from these civil society, from industry, or from governments, to cooperate, but to cooperate in the spirit of mutual understanding. I wish all of us very fascinating days here in Athens. [ Applause ] >>MINISTER MICHALIS LIAPIS: Thank you very much, indeed, commissioner Reding. That was a very interesting speech, and you have given some very constructive views, particularly from the point of view of the European Commission. At this stage, it will be very interesting to hear from the Secretary-General of the International Chamber of Commerce, Mr. Sebban. You have the floor. >>SECRETARY-GENERAL GUY SEBBAN: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, excellencies. I am very pleased and very honored to be here in Athens for this first Internet Governance Forum. I am very honored also to share the podium with such distinguished speakers. As Secretary-General of the ICC, I will speak here on behalf of global business. By this, I mean the companies from all parts of the world, from developed and from developing countries. I would like to thank our kind hosts, and especially Prime Minister Karamanlis, transport and communication minister Michalis Liapis, as well as the people of Greece. I would also like to thank and congratulate Mr. Nitin Desai, chairman of the IGF advisory group, and Mr. Markus Kummer, head of the IGF secretariat. Thank you for your great efforts in bringing us together here in this historic occasion. The world business organization, I mean ICC, represents companies of all sizes in all sectors. We have recently launched a new initiative called BASIS, business action to support information society. With this initiative, global business intends to contribute its expertise and its perspective on developing the information society to reach its full potential. Our vision is of an inclusive, people-centered information society, one where people can express themselves freely, where people everywhere are empowered by the huge amount of information and knowledge made available, and by their ability to use it for shaping the future. Thanks to entrepreneurship, investment, and a drive to innovate, business has played an important pioneering role in the Internet's development thus far. The major contribution will continue through the productive resources that companies around the world provide to the information society and through working with multistakeholder partners. We believe the calls to increase people's ability to participate in the Internet's development are really critical. We welcome the opportunity provided by the IGF to join other stakeholders on an equal footing, to share our respective expertise, and to benefit for a valuable exchange. Building on the foundation of the World Summit on the Information Society, the IGF represents an important advance. Business experts from many countries are here to share, to listen, and to learn, alongside the other stakeholder groups, enriching the process. In order to get involved, people need education, information, and training. Business believes that human and institutional capacity-building are the cornerstones of success in getting more people to participate in meaningful, productive deliberations and decision-making bodies. This effort of raising people's skill levels, understanding, and participation can only be effective if all stakeholders have input and offer their expertise. So these multistakeholder discussions facilitated by the IGF are essential to moving towards our vision. The expert-based sessions occurring this week will allow us as participating stakeholders to enhance our understanding of the issues and to return to our national and regional contexts better equipped to advance them. Considering these Internet governance issues together will also help identify areas in which more progress is needed, ideally, moving us toward greater involvement from all stakeholder groups, particularly in developing countries. In addition, these discussions can provide a basis for increased cooperation among the many organizations working on Internet governance-related issues. I would like now to raise two key questions that will be certainly addressed during this conference. How could the flow of information and the access to knowledge that is available to people be increased in a cost-effective manner and in a secure environment? And second quick question. How could more and more people with different cultures and different language skills take advantage of such an evolution? Following this first forum, we hope attendees will take many ideas home to continue the discussion and also to take action. This helps build sustainable, effective participation in Internet governance activities and promotes informed and constructive national and regional discussions. When the IGF closes on Thursday, we hope to hear people say the dialogues on these issues were substantive. We hope everyone will have learned something new and met new people and organizations to work with in the future. We hope that every participant leaves Athens with a vision of how they personally can contribute to making the information society more inclusive and people-centered. I will finish by saying that the success of the Internet is largely due to its ability to link people and empower them with more information and knowledge than ever imagined. This IGF stands to succeed on the same grounds. As participants deepen their understanding of key issues, identify new ways of cooperating with others, and go on to use what they have learned to make a difference at home. Thank you for your attention. [ Applause ] >>MINISTER MICHALIS LIAPIS: Thank you very much, Mr. Sebban, for these views which you have just presented to us on behalf of a very creative segment of the private sector, which has contributed greatly to this forum. I will also now give the floor to the director of the women's net, Mrs. Primo. And I ask her to take the floor. We will listen to your views with great interest. [ Applause ] >>MS. NATASHA PRIMO: Good afternoon, and thank you, chairperson minister Liapis. In the best traditions of diplomacy, let me say, all protocol's observed. I want to thank the organizers for inviting me to this panel and to make this input raising some of the key concerns for civil society actors. It is my interest to challenge the IGF to respond valiantly to the questions on how to advance the human rights and development agenda and make significant impact on narrowing the digital divide for women, for the differently abled, for developing countries, and for the poor generally. I will structure this input around five challenges I see facing the IGF. One, extending the human rights culture within the information society. Two, making Internet access universal and affordable. Three, building capacity for developing country participation. Four, building an inclusive process in space that capitalizes on the knowledge and participation of women. And, five, talk about the IGF as a process on the road to Rio. On the first issue of Internet governance and the human rights agenda, human rights were central to the WSIS process. In the Geneva phase, civil society actors generated significant energy and created a broad coalition that lobbied for the centrality of human rights in the Geneva documents. In the Tunis phase, civil society drew attention to the heavy-handed tactics of the Tunisian government to clamp down the activities of freedom of expression of Tunisian human rights actors, using Web site filtering and the intimidation and incarceration of journalists, among others. Increasingly, content filtering is being implemented on the pretext of protecting the safety of vulnerable children -- groups like children, but often, also, with the naked agenda of protecting incumbent governments from critical engagement by their citizens. Freedom of expression should be protected from infringement by government and nonstate actors. The Internet is a medium for both public and private exchanges of views and information across a variety of frontiers. Individuals must be able to express opinions and ideas and share information freely when using the Internet. In the post-WSIS space, there's an urgent need to strengthen the laws of human rights enforcement in the information society, to enhance human rights [inaudible] of national legislation and practices, to strengthen education and awareness on rights-based development, and to transform human rights standards into ICT policy issues. Two, ensuring Internet access is universal and affordable. Bandwidth is the lifeblood of the world's knowledge economy, but it's the scarcest where it is most needed, in developing countries, which require low-cost communications to accelerate their socioeconomic development. Few schools, libraries, universities, and research centers in Africa have any Internet access. For those who can afford it, it costs thousands of times higher than their counterparts in the developed world. And even Africa's most well-endowed centers of excellence have less bandwidth than a home broadband user in North America or Europe, and it must be shared among hundreds, even thousands, of users. In spite of the reputed rapid spread of the Internet, about five of the just over six billion people in the world remain without access to the Internet. Access could, therefore, be the single most important issue to most people, in particular, in developing countries, where people pay up to 15% of earned income on communication costs, compared to 3% of earned income spent in developed countries. The Internet is a global public space that should be open and accessible to all on a nondiscriminatory basis. In this regard, we recognize the Internet as a global public good. Access to it is in the public interest and must be a public provision. In order to meet the IGF mandate in relation to availability and affordability of the Internet, two issues need to be urgently addressed at the level of Internet governance. Namely, that of cost and tackling the infrastructure deficit in the developing world. The question is how the IGF can perform the task of advising stakeholders in proposing ways and means to accelerate the availability and affordability of the Internet in the developing world. On the issue of capacity-building, the WSIS phase was marked by the asymmetrical and unequal participation of developing countries' state and nongovernmental actors, where developing country governments were largely absent in the policy and decision-making spaces. One of the challenges for the IGF is to remain inclusive and apply itself to the question of how it will achieve its stated objective to approach Internet governance with the needs and priorities of developing countries in mind. To adequately respond to this challenge, the IGF has to be meaningful and relevant at the national level by linking international processes. Paramount must be a preoccupation with building understanding of technical processes as well as facilitating buy-in to human rights values among all governments, including developing and developed country governments. On the issue of IGF and inclusive participation, the IGF has drawn unprecedented and unexpected levels of interest from a range of stakeholders. It has gained currency as perhaps the legitimate post-WSIS space in which different stakeholders can exchange ideas and best practices intended to safeguard and extend the Internet as a global public good and to foster global buy-in into shared values like openness, transparency, equality, among others. It is a rounding achievement that the IGF has managed to organize a global event within a short space of time, with limited resources. It has put much space and energy into securing the participation of women in the IGF proceedings, especially in this opening panel and the main sessions. Yet, despite the best efforts of the organizers, a cursory perusal of the workshop programs and its participants and even of this hall confirms that these spaces remain unacceptably man-dominated. It is a challenge for all stakeholders to engage the question of how to extend and grow the Internet that we also extend meaningful participation of all stakeholders, and especially women, who make up just over 50% of the world's population. The IGF must apply its mind as to how it can provide leadership and guidance in ways to extend the participation of overstretched and underresourced women in organizations, interglobal discussion, and decision-making spaces on Internet governance. Finally, a point on the IGF as institution and process. IGF meetings must be an annual punctuation point where all stakeholders come to share lessons and best practices gathered at the national and local levels and facilitated through the interventions of the IGF. The level of stakeholders in the proceedings of the IGF places on it a burden of responsibility. This Athens meeting must be the beginning of a process that grows teeth at the same time it finds its feet. We hope for a process that will shore up the different multistakeholder actors and carry them with enthusiasm to the next meeting in Rio. I thank you for your attention. [ Applause ] >>MINISTER MICHALIS LIAPIS: Thank you, Mrs. Natasha Primo, as representative of an important member of the civil society, you have expressed some interesting views there, especially on bridging the Digital Divide. Ladies and gentlemen, we have two remaining speakers on this morning's agenda who are known as the fathers, one of them is the father of the Internet. We have got Vinton Cerf and Dr. Bob Kahn. In 1990 -- '74 they started work on this and we now have the protocol in Internet use. We have TCP, the protocol there, and IP. An awful lot of steps have been taken, and in November 2005 they were given -- awarded honors as American citizens. We would like to honor these two personalities today by inviting them to the floor, and I would like at this stage to ask Mr. Cerf, please to speak to the audience today. You have the floor. [ Applause ] >>MR. VINTON CERF: Minister Liapis, Chairman Desai, Secretary-General Utsumi, Minister Kamel, Commissioner Reding, Secretary-General Sebban, Ambassador Markus Kummer, Executive Director Primo, my good friend and colleague Robert Kahn, distinguished attendees and guests, ladies and gentlemen, it is an honor to have this opportunity to address you and to participate in this convening of the Internet Governance Forum. I think 30 years ago when Bob Kahn and I were working on the design of the Internet it would not have occurred to us that 30 years later we would be sitting in Athens with a roomful of people discussing global Internet Governance. In the 33 years since the concept of the Internet first took shape, it has become a global infrastructure of increasing value in many dimensions. Its ability to absorb new technologies and to support an increasing variety of applications are indicators of the power of its simple, clear, and well-defined technical specifications and openly accessible capabilities at all layers of its architecture. We've reached this stage as a consequence of the voluntary cooperation and coordination of literally hundreds of millions of participants, users, service providers, standards developers, application software programmers, operating system vendors, and a host of others. The influx of information on the Internet with the advent of the World Wide Web has fired our imagination and given substance to the possibility that all the world's knowledge may someday be accessible to every person on this planet and perhaps others, with the touch of a fingertip or the utterance of a few well chosen words. During the World Summit on the Information Society we learned from one another that there is still a great deal of work to be done to realize such a dream. There are only an estimated one billion users on the Internet today. That number might actually be larger if one considers that some of the two and a half billion mobiles in use are also Internet-enabled, and may be the sole means of accessing the Internet for some of the user population. We still have to provide several billion more users with access, preferably at the highest speeds technically feasible and affordable. Moreover, as the general public has become the dominant base of users on the Internet, we're finding that there are some who abuse this medium as other media have been abused. One can find fraud, harassment, illegal copying, material unsuited to children, content that's rejected in civilized societies and a range of other troubling behaviors intermingled with a massive use of useful content and services on the net. Nor are these matters simply confined to national boundaries. The Internet is a global system designed to allow everyone to interact with everyone else. And many of the problem behaviors are international in scope. These concerns will need to be addressed at local, national, and international levels and will call for cooperative technical, political, and legal efforts for their solution. The Internet Governance Forum is the latest in the potential forums in which many of these issues can be addressed and directional concepts shared. On the more positive side the Internet is already the largest distributed collection of historical and current information ever in existence. It is becoming a major facilitator of global commerce, an innovative source of education and entertainment and a powerful conduit for collaborative and coordinated personal, enterprise, and government activities. Putting into place a legal and technical framework that enhances the effectiveness of these capabilities in a global setting will further increase the value of the Internet investments made thus far and to be made in the future. Already, a variety of organizations already at work are helping to standardize or coordinate some of the efforts needed, often at the technical level, such as the Internet Architecture Board, the Internet Engineering Task Force, the World Wide Web Consortium, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, and the International Telecommunication Union. Other organizations are contributing towards a deeper understanding of the cultural and practical implications of this global and growing network such as the Internet Society, the World Intellectual Property Organization, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, among many others. The Internet Governance Forum can serve as a platform for identification of important Internet-related issues and which potential organizations already equipped to deal with them. As increasing amounts of information find their ways into the Internet's archives, it is vital that we preserve their accessibility, renderability and interpretability. Digital documents often need to be interpreted by special software packages to be rendered in understandable form. We will need to assure that the bits we preserve on digital media can also be read and understood not only by people but by computers programmed to help us manage this ocean of information. Steps are needed to assure that the information we accumulate today will be usable not merely decades but centuries and even millennia into the future. We need to preserve access to application software, operating systems, and perhaps even hardware or simulators so as to retain the ability to make effective use of our digital archives. It is equally important that we preserve the global interoperability of the Internet even as we strive to make it more inclusive of all the world's languages. Already, Unicode is helping us to record and present information in many of the world's languages on Web pages and in massive databases. There is a strong interest in the existing and nascent Internet community to have the ability to register domains written in the characters used in their preferred languages, and therein lies a huge technical challenge. Such domains are sometimes called Internationalized Domain Names, or IDNs for short. One of the most important aspects of the Internet is the ability for every user to make unambiguous references to every registered domain name. Historically, this global feature has been achieved in part by restricting host domain names to be expressed in a small subset of the Latin characters A through Z, digits zero through nine and the hyphen. It is understood that this will not suffice for users whose native language use characters other than these. At the same time, it is vital to preserve the global ability to refer to and to use every domain name. This global interoperability needs to be preserved especially as new languages are supported by the Unicode system through the addition of new characters needed to express them. It is utterly critical to appreciate that domain names are not general natural language expressions. They are simply identifiers that help users uniquely reference information in the Internet using strings of characters grouped into a sequence of labels that make up domain names. They must be unique, and names registered today must continue to work into the distant future no matter what new characters are added to the Unicode to support the expression of additional written languages. To assure this stability and global interoperability, it is necessary to permit only a carefully chosen subset of all possible characters in Unicode to be used in domain names. Work in this area will be discussed in other sessions during this Internet Governance Forum so I will simply underscore here that the work is technically challenging and will require extraordinary expertise. It is understandable that the proponents of IDNs are eager to make progress. ICANN is already conducting tests to determine the readiness of the root zone file and its associated root servers and resolvers to house or work with internationalized top level domains. Adding IDNs at all levels in the domain names system potentially affects every application that makes use of domain names. The mechanisms of the domain name system make demands on the normalization and matching of domain name strings that far exceed the simpler requirement that natural language strings be renderable using Unicode. A miss step in the specification of the IDN rules could easily and permanently break the Internet into non-interoperable components. New work in the Internet Engineering Task Force and the ICANN committee on IDNs among others is pointing the way towards specific solutions. Much work is still to be done to assure the stability and security of the Internet's addressing and routing system. To expand the address space from the present maximum of 4.3 billion unique addresses to 340 trillion trillion trillion addresses. The potential scale of such a network brings with it huge challenges associated with the management and efficiency of the Internet's low level routing tables. Accurate and verifiable records of IP address assignments are increasingly important in assuring stability of this vital part of the Internet's technical design. We have much work to do to improve the resistance of the network and its attached computers to a wide range of denial of service or other attacks. The incorporation of signed domain name zone files is but one of the many efforts underway to increase the ability of the Internet and its components to resist attacks by would-be disruptors. In addition to these technical challenges we need to join together to identify the non-technical but equally important operational frameworks in which the Internet's resources can best be deployed and applied. The openness of the Internet, the ability of its users to invent and test new applications, the freedom of virtually any computer on the network to interact with any other within the limits of safety and resistance to abuse have all contributed to its vitality and innovative character. Despite its operational existence since 1983, the Internet's application space has barely been explored. There seem to be an endless array of potential ideas left to be considered, limited only by the imagination, and our ability to produce the necessary software to make these ideas real. Together with my colleagues at ICANN and elsewhere, I am personally dedicated to helping to realize the potential of this remarkable system. I hope that all who gather in this forum will share this same desire and will work together to achieve for ourselves and those who come after us a stable, secure, global, evolving, and richly functional Internet. Thank you very much [ Applause ] >>MINISTER MICHALIS LIAPIS: Thank you very much, Mr. Cerf, for this particularly interesting presentation that you have just given us, and also for your forecast for the future. I would now like to ask the next speaker, Mr. Robert Kahn, to take the floor. Thank you. [ Applause ] >>MR. ROBERT KAHN: As the last speaker in this morning's opening session, I know I stand between you all and lunch. And so the job is on me to end as close to on time as possible. I know it's already past the ending time, so I wonder if that means I need to speak backwards [ Laughter ] >>MR. ROBERT KAHN: Mr. Chairman, distinguished speakers and guests, ladies and gentlemen, on the occasion of this first Internet Governance Forum, it is only fitting and proper to acknowledge the many contributions of individuals, private sector organizations and governments to making the Internet what it is today. As an evolving entity, the Internet will benefit from continued improvement and innovation. And through the discussions that take place here and over the next few days, we have all have an opportunity to help shape and form it better to meet our needs for the future. I specifically would like to thank the organizers of this forum for inviting me to share my thoughts with you at this opening session today. It is, indeed, a great honor for me as it surely must be for my colleague, Vint Cerf, to be so recognized in this way with the other distinguished speakers. I would also like to specifically thank them for the many years of sustained and productive collaboration that we have had. I agree that it would have been very hard for us to imagine this meeting in Athens when we first sat down to write the specs for the Internet protocol some 30 years ago at the cabana Hyatt in Palo Alto. Although this forum is focused on the development aspirations of the world community, it's really about starting an informed discussion, indeed a continuing multi-party dialogue, among those most interested in the Internet and how it can best serve the needs of people everywhere. What the forum can provide us is valuable insight into the Internet and its possible applications, it can enable an ongoing discussion about how we should manage our many collective activities in a constructive fashion, and it can uncover issues for which such discussion will be most fruitful. As an evolving infrastructure, the Internet should not be viewed only on the basis of existing technology, as that will surely constrain, even diminish, its future possibilities. Rather, we need to be continually open to and solicitous of new ideas, new technology, and even new social processes to sustain that. We've heard that from some of the other speakers today. This task will require both insight and discipline to allow the new approaches an opportunity to compete against older entrenched technologies, processes, and systems. As in other areas, healthy competition of ideas will be our best companion going forward. From the early days of the Internet, we were well aware that the open architecture model that Vint and I developed would present challenges to the status quo in the telecommunications world. Recent history has illuminated the profound importance of the Internet to so many of us on a daily basis. In my opinion, the two essential characteristics of the Internet which allowed it to take hold in so many countries around the world were the removal of central control from the overall operation of the system through the use of open architecture, and the active participation of the research community from the start. Those attributes opened the door to participation by many other organizations and individuals from around the world. We are now witnessing a continued technological revolution. Increases in bandwidth, combined with the number of new devices, access methods, and mobility, and the introduction of new information management technologies are placing difficult and sometimes competing demands on the infrastructure to support them in an integrated fashion. We need to think carefully about how best to handle this growing diversity of options going forward. New services will not appear everywhere within the Internet all at once. And our goal should be to work toward seamless integration of such services in the Internet over time so as not to result in fragmentation. In this context, it is essential that external network specifications be made available for such new services so that others can choose to participate based on their compliant implementations of those specifications. This is a role for the relevant standards bodies to consider. And in this context, the relationship of this forum to the relevant standards bodies is itself a worthwhile subject for consideration. The free flow of information as has been discussed by others may be impeded by complications that arise from diverse and perhaps contradictory policies developed independently around the world. I need only mention security concerns to highlight one area that will continue to be critical here. Increasingly, governments and private sector organizations may be called upon to coordinate such policy choices, perhaps on a bilateral basis to begin with, in order to avoid unplanned and unwanted outcomes that affect how the Internet is actually used in practice. Identifying emerging issues could be an important contribution of this forum. To assist in the process, I drafted a short list of topics that may prove useful to consider along with the many other important issues that will be discussed in this and subsequent meetings. The topics on my short list address, one, the information infrastructure needed to enable systems of linked metadata registries and interoperable collections of information, such as digital libraries and archives. This infrastructure may also permit the logical combination of such capabilities into integrated information services. For example, distributed learning environments could be one possibility. Another example, containing private information would be systems of health records. In addition to being accessed by others, with appropriate permissions of course, the possibility should exist to preserve this information over time along with a method of verifying its continued authenticity. Other parties who are primary responsibility in the creation and maintenance of the actual information would have a role to play here, too. Second would be a cost effective and technically advanced means of engaging interested parties in both formal and informal meetings and other collaborative efforts conducted over the Internet so that not everyone would need to travel to far-away places to participate. Perhaps one day we can get to a point where there is no longer a need for a meeting to have a physical presence at a specified location other than "on the Internet." I would seek to employ advanced language translation capabilities in the process, wherever possible, so all could participate on an equal playing field. Another area for discussion is how best to describe and accredit organizations and services on the Internet in a globally effective way, without an unduly intrusive certification process. Such a capability can provide a degree of certainty in various transactions. While each country may elect to have its own means of handling this situation, transparency as well as interoperability will be important so as to enable rather than impede certain Internet transactions. The early selection of the domain name system which I had a role in as a means of managing IP addresses in the Internet has proved to be helpful over time. While the DNS will continue to play an important role in the coming years, newer mechanisms with enhanced capabilities for providing identifier and resolution services should also be considered in these discussions. For example, the Handle System is widely used for this purpose around the world. It supports multilingual capabilities and security, and I would recommend that you consider the application of both identification and resolution services in the context of a more general digital object architecture of which the Handle System is one implementation of a key part. I recently addressed this subject within the U.N. ICT task force and with other U.N. bodies. The utility of this architecture ranges from traditional print material represented in digital form to its use more widely in commerce. For example, consider data structures that represent value. Here I am thinking of digital entities such as bills of lading as might be used in shipping or commerce, or stock certificates which have utility in commerce where transferrability and authenticity are key attributes. I would like to close on a more personal note. The work we did on the Internet has been augmented and improved upon by the contribution of many others over the past 30 years, and this trend will no doubt continue. In large part, this has happened by design, yet some of the most important contributions that we made, both Vint and myself, were not purely technical. We had a relatively free hand in the early days in making key decisions about the Internet and both of us have continued to participate in its continuing evolution. Along the way, we had to create many of the critical social processes that have served us well over the years. Hopefully, the Internet Governance Forum will be another important social contribution in that tradition that we can all take credit in creating. What started as a U.S. government supported and managed research activity has long since been transformed into a multi-stakeholder activity with private sector initiatives driving development and governments around the world engaged in oversight, policy development, and even funding. What began as a research activity has long since moved into a much larger context. The Internet will require continued input from the research community to keep it rejuvenated with fresh ideas that can be implemented in commercial products and services and reflected in supporting government policies. Although the focus at this forum is primarily on the Internet itself as infrastructure and its role in development, increasingly our attention will need to accommodate newly developed applications and services and their benefits, along with the many existing applications and services on the net. And we should do so in a way that has the potential to bring these benefits to all nations of the world, and to empower individuals and organizations everywhere to contribute and to take advantage of them. The opportunities for the future of the Internet are as great, if not greater, than they were when we began this adventure. And I trust that current and future generations will continue to build upon and enhance the many contributions of the past. The Internet Governance Forum can play an important role in this process. Thank you for your attention and have a great time at this forum. [ Applause ] >>MINISTER MICHALIS LIAPIS: Thank you very much, indeed, Bob Kahn, for the particularly interesting points you just put to us and for this speech which rounds off this morning's meeting. Just let me add a couple of comments. Well, we will have a presentation afterwards which deals with the Internet as a means of modern-day communication which has taken on major import mainly for the younger generation. And we have representatives of them amongst us today. So they will be raising questions which will be discussed and we will be thinking about this and we would like to have a constructive dialogue. In the same framework, we think that the children throughout the world should be able to hear your views and questions about the Internet. So in this forum, we will be dealing with this, and Mr. Kamaras Will be also introducing this event to us now. >> Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman. There are billions of people on the planet and they all use the Internet, not just to communicate amongst themselves today but also as the communicators of the future, and of course I mean children. So we should give them the opportunity to take part in the IGF, especially give them the opportunity to watch and comment on the inaugural meeting of the IGF. So I give the floor to the future. Thank you. [ Applause ] >> I imagine that you all agree with me, the questions raised by these children will be discussed over the next four days. And they will be the unofficial but very important agenda of our meeting now. Now I give the floor to the minister. >>MINISTER MICHALIS LIAPIS: Before I continue and before we close this morning, I would like to ask Mr. Kummer whether he has any housekeeping points he would like to put to us. Mr. Kummer. >>SECRETARY KUMMER: Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman. Two points. If the moderator and all panelists of this afternoon's sessions are kindly asked to meet for a preparatory meeting at 2:00 at the room Aphrodite. There will be a reception tonight hosted by minister Liapis at the palace at the Westin Athens at 8:30. There will be buses organized from all hotels to the venue. The buses will depart from the hotels at 8:00. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. >>MINISTER MICHALIS LIAPIS: I would like to thank you all for being here today and for participating. I wish you every success over the next few days. And I will bring this meeting to a close for this morning. For the afternoon, we should be back here at 3:00. Thank you.